By Chidi Chukwutem
The ongoing debate over representation for Delta North in the Senate, currently between former Senator Ifeanyi Okowa and incumbent Senator Ned Nwoko, should be guided by one essential criterion: effectiveness in the Senate.
It is not about previous titles or nostalgic affiliations; rather, it focuses on the concrete contributions each candidate has made from the Senate floor through federal legislation.
During Ifeanyi Okowa’s tenure in the Senate from 2011 to 2015, his performance was characterized by traditional participation.
While he fulfilled his duties, engaged in committee work, and adhered to party lines, his time did not significantly enhance advocacy for Delta North or yield notable constituency success.
Unfortunately, Okowa did not cultivate a distinctive voice or elevate Delta North’s national profile during his legislative term.
His tenure coincided with a period marked by many senators who preferred a subdued approach, concentrating on internal legislative affairs rather than aggressively championing the interests of their constituents.
Consequently, Okowa’s Senate record, though procedurally sound, left little impact specifically identifiable with Delta North.
In stark contrast, Ned Nwoko has approached his Senate role with vigor and determination. Since his arrival, he has demonstrated a commitment to active legislative engagement, utilizing motions, bills, and debates to maintain a prominent presence for Delta North in national discourse.
Unlike the more passive representation of the past, Nwoko has transformed the Senate into a platform for advocating for Anioma and Delta North issues within federal policy.
Nwoko’s strategy has effectively positioned Delta North to harness federal power and resources. Through his legislative efforts, committee participation, and strategic initiatives within the National Assembly, he has begun to facilitate a significant influx of federal attention and assistance to his constituency.
This is not merely symbolic politics; it represents the tangible outcomes of an active senator adept at converting parliamentary influence into real benefits for his constituents.
While Okowa’s time in the Senate was relatively unremarkable, Nwoko’s tenure is characterized by visibility, vocal advocacy, and results-driven outcomes.
He has skillfully framed issues, prompted crucial debates, and ensured Delta North is not only represented but heard in legislative discussions.
This distinction is vital; in contemporary Nigeria, a senator is evaluated not by their quiet committee presence but by their ability to impart federal significance to their constituency.
Merely having experience does not guarantee a senator’s effectiveness. Critical is the capacity to leverage the Senate as a tool for advocacy, negotiation, and the delivery of results.
On this front, the difference between the two candidates is clear. Okowa’s previous Senate term produced few achievements identifiable today as significant milestones for Delta North, while Nwoko has already set a new standard for representation in just three years.
As Delta North contemplates the choice between reverting to a period of muted representation or advancing with a dynamic legislative force, the decision is evident.
Ned Nwoko’s performance underscores a deeper engagement with the responsibilities of the office and a clear commitment to transforming legislative influence into tangible advantages for his constituents.
This is the kind of proactive representation that Delta North urgently requires.
