By Chidi Chukwutem
Basil Okoh’s recent piece, “Senator Ned Nwoko and the Plan to Steal Anioma Identity,” is a misleading cocktail of misinformation, ethnic baiting, and outdated separatist rhetoric.
It deliberately distorts historical, cultural, and political realities while ignoring overwhelming evidence of Anioma’s Igbo heritage and the growing support for its creation as a South East state.
Rather than presenting facts, Okoh’s article leans on selective anecdotes, unsubstantiated accusations, and fear-mongering to misrepresent Senator Ned Nwoko’s efforts.
Why Okoh’s Core Arguments Collapse Under Scrutiny
1. The “Poor Neighbors” Fallacy
Okoh questions why Anioma should “yoke” itself to “poor neighbors” in the South East, citing Delta State’s higher federal allocations.
This allocation-focused argument ignores broader economic realities. While Delta’s oil derivation brings in more funds, corruption and mismanagement have limited tangible development.
In contrast, South East states like Anambra and Imo have achieved strong human development indices, thriving business climates, and private-sector-driven growth despite leaner allocations.
Anioma’s integration into such a resilient economic zone would be an advantage, not a liability.
2. Misrepresenting Traditional Rulers’ Views
Okoh cites the Dein of Agbor and the Asagba of Asaba to claim broad opposition among Anioma monarchs.
This is misleading and outdated. In June 2025, South East traditional rulers unanimously endorsed Anioma State’s creation and inclusion in the region.
The late Asagba of Asaba openly supported the idea, hosting key stakeholder meetings. Even within the Ndokwa nation, previously hesitant voices are now aligning with the bill.
3. The “No Consanguinity” Myth
Okoh’s portrayal of the Niger River as an ethnic divide collapses under historical evidence. Anioma communities, Aniocha, Ndokwa, Ika, and Oshimili, are part of the western Igbo subgroup, sharing language, traditions, and festivals with communities across the river. The Niger was historically a bridge for commerce, not a barrier.
4. Accusations of Igbo “Land Grabs”
Okoh’s insinuations about Igbo “expansionism” recycle old Civil War stereotypes without context. The Ahiara Declaration was a wartime morale document, not a blueprint for conquest.
Tying Senator Nwoko’s push for equity to a conspiracy is baseless, especially when his bill enjoys support from over 90 senators and major South East monarchs.
5. The “Jara” Insult
Portraying Anioma as a mere “make-up” for the South East is dismissive and inaccurate.
Anioma brings oil wealth, human capital, and a strong cultural identity that strengthens, not dilutes, the region.
The Real Case for Anioma in the South East
Political Equity: Anioma’s inclusion would give the South East a sixth state, correcting legislative imbalances.
Cultural Unity: Anioma’s Igbo language and traditions align naturally with the South East.
Economic Synergy: Anioma’s oil resources combined with South East entrepreneurship could spur unprecedented growth.
Social Cohesion: Shared identity reduces alienation and fosters unity.
Okoh’s narrative is designed to divide where unity is urgently needed. Anioma belongs in the South East, not as a political gift, but as a rightful home based on heritage, culture, and the promise of equitable development.
Senator Nwoko’s vision is one of inclusion and fairness. It’s time Anioma embraced its roots and claimed its place in shaping a fairer Nigeria.
